Social Work Students’ Opinions About Social Work Education: A Focus Group Study

Seda ATTEPE ÖZDEN, Melike TEKİNDAL

Abstract


This study aims to present an assessment of social work education from the student’s perspective. In this sense, four semi-structured focus group interviews were held with a total of 23 students from two universities. Nine of the 23 students who participated in the study are male and fourteen are girls. Two of the students are in the second class and others are in the third class. The average age of the students is 22.3. MAXQDA was used for the analysis. According to analysis, two themes were found. These are current status of social work education and expectations from the social work education and suggestions. Students were found to be willing to participate actively in the courses, criticizing rote-learning and emphasizing that social work educators play an important role. In this context, the suggestions of the students is that the education given is sensitive to current events, is oriented towards providing practical skills and supports active learning. They also pointed out that educators should have role models, warm, sincere, egalitarian relationships with the students. The results of the study are thought to contribute to the planning and implementation of social work education.


Keywords


focus groups, students’ opinions, social work education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alptekin, K. (2016). Başlangıçtan bugüne ve yarına Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet eğitimi [Social work education in Turkey from beginning to today and tomorrow]. Ankara: Atlas Yayınevi.

Andron, S. (2013). Rebuilding New Orleans: A community field learning experience. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(3), 297-307. DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2013.795207

Arıkan, Ç. (2002). Sosyal hizmet eğitiminde aktif öğrenmeye ilişkin düşünceler [Opinions about active learning in social work education]. In K.Karataş ve S.İl, (Ed.). Sosyal hizmet eğitiminde yeniden yapılanma I [Reconstruction in social work education I]. (163–169). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Hizmetler Yüksekokulu.

Avant, D. W., Bracy, W. (2015). Teaching note—Using problem-based learning to illustrate the concepts of privilege and oppression. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(3), 604-614. DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2015.1043207

Baker, H. E., Brown, P. P. (2015). Teaching retirement financial literacy in an undergraduate gerontology classroom: broadening the concept of the tripodor three-legged stool of retirement ıncome utilizing active learning. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 36(4), 416-424. DOI: 10.1080/02701960.2015.1031892

Burgess, H. (1992). Problem-led learning for social work: the enquiry and action approach. London: Whiting and Birch.

Cifci Gökçearslan, E. (2009). Social work profession and social work education in Turkey. World Conference on Educational Sciences, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, (2063–2065).

Council on Social Work Education [CSWE]. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards for baccalaureate and master’s social work programs. Commission on Accreditation Commission on Educational Policy. Retrieved August 2016, from http://www.cswe.org/file.aspx?id=81660

Education system Turkey. (2015). The Turkish education system described and compared with the Dutch system. EP-Nuffic (2nd edition December 2010) version 3, January 2015, https://www.epnuffic.nl/en/publications/find-a-publication/education-system-turkey.pdf

Flaherty, C. Ely, G. E., Meyer-Adams, N., Baer, J., Sutphen, R. D. (2013). Are social work educators bullies? Student perceptions of political discourse in the social work classroom, Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(1), 59-74, DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2012.750259

Gaižauskaitė, I. (2012). The use of the focus group method in social work research. Socialinis Darbas Social Work, 11(1), 19–30.

İçağasıoğlu Çoban, A., Polat Uluocak, G. (2011). Bologna süreci sosyal hizmet eğitimine ne getiriyor? [What brings Bologna process to social work education?]. In Sosyal Hizmet Sempozyumu 2011: 50.Yılında Türkiye'de Sosyal Hizmet Eğitimi: Sorunlar, Öncelikler ve Hedefler. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.

İl, S. (2001). Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet eğitiminde aktif öğrenme [Enquiry and action learning in social work education in Turkey]. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 12 (2), 99–105.

International Federation of Social Work. [IFSW]. (2014). Global definiton of social work, Retrieved May 2018, from http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work/

Jaques, D. (2000). Learning in groups. (3rd edn.). London: Kogan Page.

Karataş, K., İl, S. (Eds.). (2002). Sosyal hizmet eğitiminde yeniden yapılanma I [Reconstruction in social work education I]. Ankara: Aydınlar Matbaası.

Lawrence, S. (2009). The Bologna process: China- Europe forum social work education workshop summary paper from European participants. Retrieved May 2018, from http://www.china-europa-forum.net/bdfdoc-1420_en.html

McAleese, M. Bladh, A. Berger, V.Bode, C., Muehlfeit, J.,Petrin, T.,Schiesaro, A., Tsoukalis, L. (2013). High level group on the modernisation of higher education. Report to The European Commission On Improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions, Retrieved August 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/library/reports/modernisation_en.pdf

Öğrenci Seçme ve Yükseköğretim Programları ve Kontenjanları Kılavuzu, [ÖSYS]. [Guide to Student Selection and Higher Education Programs and Quotas]. (2017). Retrieved May 2018, from https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2017/OSYS/LYS/KONTENJANKILAVUZ18072017.pdf

Panwar, M., Mathur, D., Chand, G., Dkhaka, M., Singh, R. R., Moxley, D. P. (2014). Action learning in the Indian village as an alternative to the traditional field practicum in the foundation year of the MSW. Social Work Education, 33(8), 984-997. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2014.921285

Papadaki, V., Katsouli, M., Tournikis, A., Papadaki, E. (2012). ‘How do you feel about studying social work?’—social work students in Greece: Demands, support, feelings about their studies and attitudes towards themselves. Social Work Education, 31(7), 819-834, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2011.607810

Peleg-Oren, N., Aran, O., Even-Zahav, R., Macgowan, M. J., Stanger, V. (2007). An innovative program in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27(3-4), 157-165. DOI: 10,1300/J067v27n03_10

Ping, L. X. (2012). Educating a reflective and active social worker: how social work education responds to a social problem. China Journal of Social Work, 5(3), 277-283. DOI: 10.1080/17525098.2012.721526

Sha, W., Wong, Y., Lou, V. W. Q., Pearson, V., Gu, D. (2012). Career preferences of social work students in Beijing and Shanghai, Social Work Education, 31(1), 4-21. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2010.538672

Strand, V. C., Abramovitz, R., Layne, C. M. Robinson, H. Way, I. (2014). Meeting the Critical Need for Trauma Education in Social Work: A Problem-Based Learning Approach. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(1), 120-135.

Teigiser, K. S. (2009). Field note: new approaches to generalist field education, Journal of Social Work Education, 45(1), 139-146.

The Council of Higher Education [COHE]. (2014). Higher Education System in Turkey. Ankara. Retrieved June 2016, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10348274/10733291/TR'de+Y%C3%BCksek%C3%B6%C4%9Fretim+Sistemi2.pdf/9027552a-962f-4b03-8450-3d1ff8d56ccc

The Council of Higher Education [COHE]. (2016). Retrieved November 2016, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/guest/universitelerimiz

Tuncay, T., Tufan, B. (2011). Social work education and training in Republican Turkey. In S. Stanley, (Ed.). Social work education in countries of the East: Issues and challenges (543-562). New York: Nova Publishers.

Wilson, B. M., Pollock, P. H., Kerstin, H. (2007). Does active learning enhance learner outcomes? Evidence from discussion participation in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(2), 131-142.

Wilson, G., Kelly, B. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of social work education: Preparing students for practice learning. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2431–2449. DOİ: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq019




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3182

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


indexed by TR-DİZİN, DOAJ, SOBİAD

 


Creative Commons License  
 Kastamonu Eğitim'de yayınlanan tüm içerik ve makaleler "Creative Commons Alıntı 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı" ile lisanslanmıştır.